LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Apostolos Syropoulos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 May 2001 21:21:52 +0300
In-Reply-To:
<v03110708b729ba577345@[195.100.226.134]>
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Hans Aberg wrote:

> At 18:59 +0200 2001/05/17, Lars Hellström wrote:
> >>The \epsilon and \varepsilon are definitely semantically different in
> >>(pure) math,
> >
> >Are they? Please give a verifiable example!
>
> Here are two examples:
>   $\epsilon\varepsilon R$
>   $\varepsilon R$
>
> Today one would probably write one of
>   $\epsilon\in R$
>   $\varepsilon\in R$
> (perhaps with $R$ in black-board bold).

I believe your example is incorrect. The right way to write the first
formula should be:
$\varepsilon \epsilon R$.
A.S.

****************************************************************
*Apostolos Syropoulos                                          *
*snail mail: 366, 28th October Str., GR-671 00  Xanthi, HELLAS *
*email     : [log in to unmask]                        *
*phone num.: +30-(0)541-28704                                  *
*home page : http://obelix.ee.duth.gr/~apostolo                *
****************************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2