LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bernard Gaulle <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:32:16 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Frank Mittelbach introducing "inpmath":
 > \usepackage{inpmath}
 > \DeclareMathMeaning{\"}{\ddot}

pleased to see that project which was already implemented...
at least in French Pro along with the "keyboard" package.
Since i did that for the "mltex" option, i really appreciate
to have it available without it too.

But.. i consider there is a little typographic pb because, in
the current example, the diacritic should not be at the same
place in math (italic) and in text since fonts are very different.
This is in fact a basic TeX pb.

Doing that, what about \c and \C? or \L and \o and such?
and \oe, \OE ? The pb is a little more complicated and
should often require a new definition of that macros.

 > i would be very much interested in comments concerning the approach the
 > feasibility or anything else you find useful to discuss in this respect, eg
 >
 >  should such an implementation be incorporated (somehow not this one),
 >     - as a package,
 >     - as a standard,

yes, as a standard-goal.

  --bg

ATOM RSS1 RSS2