LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:19:37 +0930
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Joseph Wright
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>> Something like
>>   \IfOldPackageDate{2006/06/08}{...implement old functionality...}
>> )
>
> An interesting idea, but gets very complex very quickly (if one makes
> more than a trivial number of changes).

True. Perhaps a better idea, for those interested in absolute
backwards compatibility, is a (standard) method to keep the old
package versions lying around with standardised filenames (say,
siunitx-20080823.sty) that can be loaded when necessary.

Lance Carnes wrote about this sort of thing in an editorial in the
most recent PracTeX Journal. So I guess there must be *some* need for
it...

Will

ATOM RSS1 RSS2