LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:18:51 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
On 27/02/2015 17:00, David Carlisle wrote:
> On 27/02/2015 16:36, Élie Roux wrote:
>>> Indeed: that is the thinking.
>>
>> Good!
>>
>>> At the moment the focus needs to be on the current update.
>>
>> By the way, did you integrate all of this:
>>
>> https://github.com/lualatex/luatexbase/blob/master/luatexbase-regs.dtx#L266
>>
> 
> The
> new register allocation code has the correct upper range for each of
> classic tex, etex, xetex and luatex, but is different to the etex.sty code.
> 
>> ? Should I make an update removing a few things (or everything)? Can
>> the LaTeX update and this code coexist?
>
> They can co-exist in that if you load etex.sty we checked that it
> cleanly overwrites everything and so did what it always did.
> that would mean you lose the float allocation mechanism.
>
> So at some point you probably want to not load etex.sty and not make
> those fixes if you detect a new format, but it is not critical that
> happens day one of a latex release.

Our own plan for expl3 is to do a test for \extrafloats or \e@alloc
[depending on who writes the test :-)], and if they are available to
skip loading etex.sty.
--
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2