LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:31:13 +0200
MIME-version: 1.0
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15
Subject: Re: \parshape in lists
From: Morten Høgholm <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To: <001f01c48531$4489f4c0$95f86750@PROPIETAFMI1K9>
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (23 lines) 
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:40:04 +0200, Javier Bezos <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Just a little question. Apparently the only occurrence
> in LaTeX of \parshape is in \list and I wonder why
> it was preferred to other possibilities like \hangindent
> or \leftskip/rightskip. Any ideas?

One could use
   \hangindent \@totalleftmargin
   \hangafter -<really large number>
which isn't quite as "good looking" as \parshape=1

Using
   \leftskip\@totalleftmargin
works fine until you start issuing \raggedright etc. inside the
environment.

Cheers,
--
Morten Høgholm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2