Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:23:46 +1030 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-14-1060672142; micalg=sha1;
protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 18/02/2009, at 10:42 AM, Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard wrote:
> Will Robertson a écrit :
>> So here, while \the isn't a macro, it will expand when used
>> correctly in
>> an edef (e.g., \edef\foo{\the\baselineskip} ). I've explicitly
>> caught
>> undefined macros to return "F" because it just seemed more logical
>> that
>> way.
>>
> In my understanding of the term, macros are always "expandable". I
> think
> in the context of this function, "expandable" should mean the same
> as in
> the TeXbook, (p. 212-214 in my edition) after the text
Ah, okay. Foolishly, I don't have a copy handy.
That naming makes more sense now.
>> Now let's consider the control sequences that are expanded whenever
>> expansion has not been inhibited. Such control sequences fall into
>> several classes:
>
> Here macros are described as "expandable" regardless of whether they
> are
> defined or not.
Odd. I suppose it's understandable, though.
Thanks for the help,
Will
|
|
|