Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:25:55 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Friday 18 July 2003 08:45, Torsten Bronger wrote:
> My dream is to just insert the UTF-8 sequence of 0x107 and it
> works. Of course, the "cacute" doesn't make sense in math mode, and
> therefore LaTeX doesn't support such things, however I cannot tell
> XML authors which characters they are allowed to type. Even the
> standard latin1 inputenc option isn't math-proof.
I don't know much about XML,
but this seems to me completely contrary to its philosophy.
Surely XML markup is _meant_ to reflect the meaning of the content
rather than just what you want printed.
I would have thought TeX was much better suited to your needs in this case.
As I see it, Knuth put common-sense above theoretical exactitude,
while XML takes the opposite point of view. as MathML illustrates.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
tel: +353-86-233 6090
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
|
|
|