LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Rowley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Feb 2003 18:28:55 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Bjoern

> Yes, it looks right. But what is making me think is, that the original
> calculations seem right. It appears, that the floatbox-origin is shifted
> somewhere. So maybe it is really something in the float-setup or
> float-boxing that is wrong, and my fix is just a work-around.
> Especially, as the offset seems to depend on the spancnt of the float,
> something that is not used in this part of xo-new.
>

Yes, I agree that that seems odd.

> I still have some trouble tracing the float-placement, so I have not found
> anything there, that looks wrong. So that's what I meant with "the right
> place".
>

Hmm, yes!  Tricky stuff geometry.

That kind of placment stuff needs a cleaner interface, probably in a
seperate `module'.


chris

ATOM RSS1 RSS2