LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hans Aberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:37:39 +0200
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
>Philip Taylor writes:
> > How can that work?  Assuming that (e.g.) "\newcommand" is macro ->
> > {... \def ...}, then without a LaTeX equivalent of PostScript's
> > "bind", you still need access to "\def"; and if "\newcommand" is
> > macro -> {... \someconcealedversionofdef ...}, then the user can
> > use "\someconcealedversionofdef" :-(

  I guess there will be a command called \tex_def or \tex/def or something,
which one can use.

  Hans Aberg
                  * Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
                  * Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
                  * AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2