LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Robin Fairbairns <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 09:18:45 +0100
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 18 Jun 1997 13:59:29 EDT." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (15 lines)
> In any case, I have strong doubts whether what is good for Elsevier
> is necessarily what is good for the latex community or for the
> academic community.

I've no doubt Sebastian has, too.  However, I believe we ignore "the
publishers' attitude" at our peril, and we've got precious few
publishers talking to us just now.

What has LaTeX 3 done, up to now?  Is it merely techniques, or has
some new UI code be written already?  My understanding was the former:
if I'm right, we are well-placed to be thinking the unthinkable right

Robin F