LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 13:59:50 +0000
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (15 lines)
 >
 > It seems to me that it is much better for a few people to work hard at
 > LaTeX to HTML conversion, or whatever is required, rather than making
 > each author of each paper do a lot of unnecessary work.
 >

Sure, thats why I said it *shouldnt* be an author constraint. People
who convert LaTeX should do so properly, or say up front that they
cannot do it, rather than unreasonably constraining authors.

latex2html is a red herring, of course. in practise, i don't think any
large scale publisher goes this route.

sebastian

ATOM RSS1 RSS2