LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Dec 1998 10:06:02 +0000
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Joachim Schrod writes:
 > Do you really want to tell us that TEI is not one of the most complex
 > DTDs that ever got written?
no. but its used quite a lot.

 >  Docbook is not an easily understandable one, either.
plenty of people seem to manage with it

 > Could you please bring in other examples? These currently support the
 > hypothesis that it's "tortuosly difficult".
the fact that Docbook and TEI are themselves complex does not
demonstrate that the extensibiliy features were/are hard to add.

no, i dont have any other convincing examples. but if i asked you to
develop a DTD, and said I wanted some extensibility, you would say
"sure, no problem, lets see what you need", i bet.

sebastian

ATOM RSS1 RSS2