LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: [NTG-pdftex] \expanded
From:
David Kastrup <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:33:14 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
Morten Høgholm <[log in to unmask]> writes:

> I would assume the following should be equivalent except for the
> latter being expandable.
>
> \def\cmd#1{\edef\tempa{#1}\expandafter\cmd\expandafter{\tempa}}
>
> \def\cmd#1{\expandafter\cmd\expandafter{\expanded{#1}}}

No.  The former would complain about isolated # tokens in #1 (and
collapse double ones).

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

ATOM RSS1 RSS2