LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 May 2011 07:09:55 +0100
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
On 15/05/2011 22:35, Bruno Le Floch wrote:
> Proposal: to ban trailing optional arguments entirely.

At a pure LaTeX3 level, I think we may move in that direction to some
extent (although I think \item[...] is a good example where there is
simple alternative). Frank has pointed out that at this stage we want to
keep the user syntax for LaTeX3 'open', but I always point out that
'something like LaTeX2e but more organised' is a likelihood. To me, that
means

  \foo[...]{...}

is a possible, but I'd hope not

  \foo{...}[...]

(i.e. I'm in favour a a single optional argument, which should come
first, at least as a standard approach.)
-- 
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2