LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karl Berry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:13:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
    from a practical point of view I personally prefer to have all
    production files for one type of task in one directory rather than
    in 2

Indeed, I actually think it would be a great step if we could abandon
TDS with its harebrained(*) splitting by file format, and every package
simply be installed in /some/texmf/packagename-vvvv, as the author
creates it.  Then the whole ctan->tds conversion problem goes away,
updates become relatively simple, authors can do whatever crazy subdir
structure they want, etc.

(No, I'm not planning to change TL or anything else in this way. :)

karl

(*) it was necessary back then, but I see no deep reason for it now.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2