LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:22:18 +0100
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Benjamin BAYART <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Le Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 06:57:09PM +0100, Joachim Schrod:
> 
> Which of those do you want to keep? There are good arguments for all
> of them.

This is why, in my opinion, two tools are usefull:
- a "token look ahead"
- a "node look backward"

The two opposites are meaningless, as far as I understand the working of
TeX.

The real difficulties come from having the right kind of registers for
every kind of node. A workaround can be to use hbox for everything not
yet implemented in registers, I don't know if it is the good solution.
At least it sounds feasible easily, which is a great quality.

Regards,

	Benjamin.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2