Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:36:01 +0100 |
Content-Type: | Text/Plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Responding to an oooold email...
From: Dominique Unruh <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [latexuni] latin-t5 & letter i
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 00:19:14 +0200
> [log in to unmask] wrote:
> > I am using latexuni in Vietnamese (latin-t5). I found errors with
> > letter i. Accent, grave, tilde combining with letter i do not
> > produce correct symbols. I found "tilde combining with i" use
> > macro "\~\i" while it should be "\~i".
The current version of t5enc.def (as in the TeXLive repository) gives
this:
\'i -> Ã
\'\i -> Ã
\`i -> ì
\`\i -> ì
\~i -> Ä©
\~\i -> Ä©
\h i -> ỉ
\h\i -> ỉ
\d i -> ị
\d\i -> ị (*)
I consider the entry marked with (*) as an error and will probably
remove it in an upcoming revision.
> In my opinion, this is not the fault of latexuni, but of T5. The
> reason is the following: In the encodings T1, OT1, T2A, T2B, T2C,
> OT2, and T3 the macro \~\i produces the desired result, while \~i
> produces an i with dot *and* tilde.
The difference between T5 and the other T encodings regarding \~i is
justified IMHO. I'm even going to say that the behaviour in the
non-T5 encodings is incorrect; they miss entries like
\DeclareTextCompositeCommand{\~}{T1}{i}{\~\i}
which aren't there because `Ä©' is not used in any other language
besides Vietnamese AFAIK, so there was never a need to add them.
> BTW: [...] in \~i its seems to me, that the tilde is a little too
> near the i, it looks a little crowded.
You are talking about vnr, aren't you? I've CCed this email to HÃ n
Thế Thà nh; he can answer this best.
Werner
|
|
|