LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
\cs:c
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:32:05 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
Another quesition, I'm afraid.  In the main, I get the impression :w
macros should be avoided if there is an equivalent :c or :n one.
However, although there is \chk_exist_cs:c, the is no mention of \cs:c
(= \@nameuse).  I'd have thought this would be a good idea, or is there
a reason for avoiding this?
-- 
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2