LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robin Fairbairns <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:35:40 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Frank Mittelbach <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>  > I also wrote the xepersian package which you
>  > can find in CTAN. Let me clarify that my work is going to replace the other
>  > packages and systems providing Persian typesetting in TeX. Also please note
>  > that farsitex is a dead project and it is based on latex2.09 not latex 2e,
> 
> yes, I noticed that following the link that Joseph supplied, that looks like a
> dead end I agree.
> 
>  > so the main aim here is to write something which works with latex2e. I also
>  > agree that having a seperate latex format is difficult and time consuming
>  > but I have so much passion about Persian typesetting in LaTeX that will put
>  > all my energy for it. Also Polish and another language (which I do not
>  > remember) format of latex are avaliable. 
> 
> I'm not sure there are such formats these days.

oh, there are.  while i can't actually find a reference, there was a
conflict during the development of tl2008, about who had the right to
the name "ptex" -- there were polish formats under than name, as well as
a japanese tex system.

i don't actually understand what they do, but afaict, the japanese have
their own latex setup, though it seems that the polish are quietly
forgetting theirs.

> There might be special
> distributions that package stuff otherwise not bundled with TeX/LaTeX
> normally, but different formats? But even if, the question remains what you
> gain.

if you have to load 20 packages just to get going, i believe it's
difficult to ignore david's mylatex, even allowing for the speed of
modern machines.

> Anyway, I'm looking forward to learn more about language needs for Persian
> (and other languages) that so far admittedly have been neglected (in parts
> because the developers within LaTeX didn't understand them

me too.  the printed language is actually rather beautiful, even for
those (like me) who don't read it at all.

robin

ATOM RSS1 RSS2