LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:18:15 +0100
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Gellmu, was Re: xparse
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
Will Robertson wrote:
> I suppose my general question is: would Gellmu make a good candidate for
> a standardised LaTeX3 input syntax? My initial impressions are positive,
> but I'm way out of my league.

Me too :-) Actually defining input syntax is always listed as "for
later", but does need to be tackled at some point. Perhaps a subject for
a separate thread?
-- 
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2