LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ulrike Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 May 2014 18:00:19 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Am Thu, 8 May 2014 13:51:34 +0100 schrieb David Carlisle:


> If anyone has some real biblatex  files and could confirm to me that 
> this doesn't break them I'd be grateful.

I tested a bit with various files and it seems ok. But -- as the
question on tex.sx shows -- the bug didn't always lead to errors but
could simply produce faulty output and it is not so easy to check if
somewhere an "and" or a comma is missing.

If one loads the new xkeyval v2.6c before keyval the error is still
there. So xkeyval needs a patch too. 

-- 
Ulrike Fischer 
http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2