 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
| Date: |
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:49:42 +0930 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 05/09/2009, at 11:10 AM, Heiko Oberdiek wrote:
> Is there a chance, that this could happen to xpackages as well?
> Then module `latex3' of latex-tds would become obsolete.
Your wish is my command :)
I'll see what I can do this afternoon.
> BTW:
> expl3.tds.zip contains a duplicate:
>
> 4619 06-02-09 02:16 source/latex/expl3/l3vers.dtx
> 4619 06-02-09 02:16 tex/latex/expl3/l3vers.dtx
>
> Is there a reason for the second one? It looks misplaced among
> the .sty files.
It needs to be there, but I don't know if it NEEDS to be there. Some
historical code in l3doc (\includeltpatch) contains \input{l3vers.dtx}
in order to check the distribution date against a (nonexistent so far)
patch file.
Without knowing how the team has dealt with these patch files in the
past, nor whether we'll use them again in the future, I've just left
the code as is. But at this stage it's not being used.
Cheers,
Will
|
|
|
