Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:04:30 +0100 |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<20100311212544.GA4583@khaled-laptop> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:25:44PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:24:06PM +0100, Heiko Oberdiek wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:12:25PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >
> > > What about the approach we used in etex.src; redefining \patterns and
> > > \hyphenation to use corresponding lua functions, so we don't need to
> > > duplicate hyphenation files and, AFAIU, solves the catcode issue.
> >
> > \patterns is not read by Lua but by TeX, thus the catcode
> > problem remains.
>
> I don't claim that I understand anything, but do we have some example
> for the likes of me to see the problem?
* verbatim mode
* babel shorthands
* other active characters
* ...
At format generation the catcodes are known, the pattern files
are written for that case. Later the catcodes can be anything.
Yours sincerely
Heiko <[log in to unmask]>
|
|
|