LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Will Robertson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Oct 2010 12:43:48 +1030
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
On 2010-10-04 11:57:27 +1030, "David J. Perry" 
<[log in to unmask]> said:

> Ross and Will,
> 
>> So the first question should be what is the version of XeTeX that MikTeX
>> is providing.
>> And is David actually using that, or still an earlier version, as I was on
>> a Mac.
>> If the primitive is not there, then the latest versions of expl3 and
>> fontspec just will not work, and may not even succeed in loading
>> successfully. Is that not correct?
> 
> As the person  who raised the issue, I would like to help solve it.
> Unfortunately, the problem developed on my machine upstate, where I was for
> the weekend.  I'm now back in the city to teach tomorrow morning, and my
> machine here has not had the MiKTeX update that I applied this weekend.  If
> no one else sends in an example, I will certainly do so when I get back
> upstate on Friday.

On further reflection, even confirming that the "not-updated" case 
compiles correctly would be helpful. (As it would indicate 
approximately when the error appeared.) Can you prepare the same 
minimal example on your current setup?

Thanks,
Will

ATOM RSS1 RSS2