LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Robin Fairbairns <[log in to unmask]>
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:10:54 +0000
Your message of Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:24:13 -0500. <[log in to unmask]>
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
text/plain (28 lines)
Bruno Le Floch <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> A plea for slow computers: I don't know how much having a format will
> accelerate loading, but I guess that adding tikz would be too much.

in the case of pgf/tikz, the acceleration will be enormous, i would
imagine.  (i don't do pictures any more, but the pgf/tikz tree on the
archive makes me feel slightly faint.)

however, there _is_ mylatexformat, and anyone may build their own format
for their own work.  a latex3 format is one thing.  a latex3 format
that's good for everyone's requirements is going to take as long as
context has since it started, i would guess.

personally, i wouldn't add anything to it, beyond the replacements for
the functionality of current latex (excepting, of course, the extensions
-- coffins, most recently -- that we discuss here.

so i would be sympathetic to fontspec and unicode-math, but sceptical of
many other things that have been suggested here.

> Perhaps the {trace} package (although it seems included in l3chk, but
> not loaded by expl3?)?

however, i _can_ see the rationale of that...