## LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

 Options: Use Classic View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

 Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:09:05 -0500 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Re: a question of style MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]> In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 From: Bruno Le Floch <[log in to unmask]> Parts/Attachments: text/plain (14 lines) > As this is ment for document level, I am tempted to use > \NewDocumentCommand. But this word is longer than the whole code of the > macro itself, that blows some simple code really up. On the other hand, > using \def would be very short but is not LaTeX3-ish. \cs_new:Nn doesn't > let me define something without a : at the end. Or would a \tl_new be a > good way? I don't know what the right way of doing things is. Two ways I can think of are \cs_new:Npn \ie {i.\,e.} \tl_new:Nn \ie {i.\,e.} Bruno