LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:18:27 +0100
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: l3keys feature request
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
On 09/07/2013 08:36, Jura Pintar wrote:
> Hi all (though I suppose this is mostly for Joseph),
> 
> Since there are updates of l3keys in progress, I was wondering what the
> final verdict was on this proposal for .meta:nn and
> \keys_subgroups_set:nnn... We'd been talking about it, but then I had
> things crop up and I don't think a conclusion was ever reached...
> 
> Best,
> 
> Jura

Not forgotten! .meta:nn will happen, possibly later today. Subgroups
still need a little thought: I see a few ways to tackle it, but first
want to deal with the other l3keys stuff.
-- 
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2