LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 May 2018 00:24:46 +0200
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Subject:
From:
Juergen Fenn <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
juergenfenn.de
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Am 07.05.18 um 23:27 Uhr schrieb Arthur Reutenauer:
> If anything, the comparatively slow pace of
> development of BibTeX & al. has contributed to its format becoming
> standard.

I think that's a good point. Given the pace of development in LaTeX
nowadays, I wonder whether this is the way to build a new standard. Who
cares about latexrelease, \UseRawInputEncoding, etc. after all? Most
users rely on the idea that LaTeX is stable and will not break. That a
given input will always produce the same output. No criticism at taking
LaTeX further, none at all, but we should probably say it much louder to
the general public that something has changed about the pace of
development as opposed to what it used to be in order to prevent
disappointment.

Regards,
J├╝rgen.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2