LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Sep 2008 18:12:22 +0100
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: AW: tlp type
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines) 
Mittelbach, Frank wrote:

> i prefer \def:Npn over \def:NNn even for a function without arguments. 

I see the point here.  So should \def:NNn (and \def_new:NNn) be around
at all?
-- 
Joseph Wright

ATOM RSS1 RSS2