LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:33:10 +0200
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From:
Élie Roux <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Le 18/07/2015 12:26, Stephan Hennig a écrit :
> Say I write a pure Lua package replacing
> all A glyphs by Z in whatever callback.  How do I hook into that
> callback in a format independent way?  A luatexbase package that
> abstracts from minimal format implementations (as far as such are needed
> in a format) would solve that issue.

This seems highly theoretical to me... If you want a package developped
in a format-independant way, I guess you mean Plain, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and
home-made formats. But luatexbase is not ported to ConTeXt and as far as
I know, there is no callback management in ConTeXt, you can't hook into
a callback without breaking everything... So format-independant packages
are already technically impossible and I fail to really understand your
point... can you give a more precise example of a possible problem?

Also, luatexbase has not moved for a couple of years, and there's no one
to maintain or develop it, so I think what's currently happening is
quite a good thing.

Thank you,
-- 
Elie

ATOM RSS1 RSS2