LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:11:38 +0200
Content-Disposition: inline
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID: <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
From: Arthur Reutenauer <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (17 lines)
> I think so, yes.

  I’m glad :-)

> Yes.  Where is the contradiction?  Assuming that at the time of my
> package's version 1.8 the upstream version of `fontspec.sty' contains
> the patches I need, I no longer use `fontspec-patched.sty'.

  There’s no contradiction if you do it like that, but your message
could just as easily be read as meaning that you were not going to
change the name of the patched file, since you didn’t plan to distribute