Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard wrote:
> L3news02 states that "The expl3 code is now considered to be much more
> stable than it was before". expl3.pdf (section 6 "the *experimental*
> distribution") says "the interface will change". OTOH, source3 states that "The
> syntax conventions and functions provided are now ready for wider use." Who's
> right between expl3 and source3? (I assume source3, but...)

Right, expl3 and source3 now agree, and I've tidied up the module list
in expl3 to include only those that are stable. (Note to rest of team: I
hope everyone else agrees with me on this!).  I'll do a bit of reading
later, then probably send a snapshot to CTAN.
-- 
Joseph Wright