LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hans Aberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Oct 1997 14:50:56 +0200
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
At 20:39 -0400 97/10/07, Mark Steinberger wrote:
>Many journals these days work from author-created tex files, and a
>substantial portion of the authoring community uses amstex.

  I think the reason for this, is that the early versions of AMS-LaTeX had
problems. But are there any reasons for still using AMS-TeX?

>It sure would be nice if someone would distribute a good amstex to latex
>converter.
..
>I'm told the AMS has such a converter for in-house use, but I don't
>know of one available to the public.

  This seems to be a good idea: It is not difficult to do the conversions
by hand (that is, if each author does it), but a converter would surely
help promoting AMS-LaTeX.

  Hans Aberg
                  * AMS member: Listing <http://www.ams.org/cml/>
                  * Email: Hans Aberg <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2