LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Arthur Reutenauer <[log in to unmask]>
Tue, 1 Aug 2017 19:11:38 +0200
text/plain (17 lines)
> I think so, yes.

  I’m glad :-)

> Yes.  Where is the contradiction?  Assuming that at the time of my
> package's version 1.8 the upstream version of `fontspec.sty' contains
> the patches I need, I no longer use `fontspec-patched.sty'.

  There’s no contradiction if you do it like that, but your message
could just as easily be read as meaning that you were not going to
change the name of the patched file, since you didn’t plan to distribute
it.

	Best,

		Arthur

ATOM RSS1 RSS2