LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:20:43 +0200
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAD7FD68B72C4B454E591EC38"
From:
Arno Trautmann <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (480 bytes) , signature.asc (261 bytes)
Will Robertson wrote:
> On 20/09/2010, at 11:27 PM, Frank Mittelbach wrote:
> 
>> is there actually any need for the :nnn etc versions?
> 
> Not sure, is there?
> They seem natural to me; better than nesting multiple :nn commands for more than two ‘and’ branches, say.

But then you’re lost at five ”and“. What about, say
\bool_and_p:n {\bool1,...,\booln}
i.e. a list of boolean expressions? (Just for the interface, no idea how
to implement this in an efficient way)

cheers
Arno



ATOM RSS1 RSS2