LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bruno Le Floch <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Aug 2012 01:28:27 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On 8/2/12, Joseph Wright <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 02/08/2012 16:58, Joel C. Salomon wrote:
>>     "\some_function_with_a_very_long_name:nnnnn" <first argument>
>> <second argument> <third argument> <fourth argument> <fifth argument>
>
> Not related to the issue, but in general we've favoured
>
>   \cs{some_function} \Arg{with an argument}
>
> (Looking long-term, I think this might be better to avoid active
> characters, while \cs... offers more possibilities than just 'verbatim'
> when consdiering format conversions.)

I seem to recall using ^^A as a comment character in the syntax
environment (and really anywhere else in the "% ..." documentation
lines).

Regards,
Bruno

ATOM RSS1 RSS2