LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hans Aberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Apr 1997 20:46:16 +0200
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
At 16:36 97-04-16, Frank Mittelbach wrote:

>what it proves is that there isn't yet a successor to TeX that people
>use to replace TeX on a large scale and as long as this is the case
>development for a successor only, doesn't solve problems for them.

  For this to work, there must be a body that issues TeX upgrades, which
are suffiently conservative that the many TeX implementations only need to
flip in the new source code, I think.

  Hans Aberg

ATOM RSS1 RSS2