LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Michiel Helvensteijn <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:05:21 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary=14dae93411b16a7a4404d189c44e
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (484 bytes) , patch (2543 bytes)
Hi all!

As I was learning LaTeX3, I stumbled upon some information missing
from the docs. Apparently the \cs_new: functions (and friends) do not
handle expansion for you just because you use 'x' in your argument
specifier. They should be used only to define the base function and
variants should be defined with \cs_generate_variant:Nn.

I feel like this should be part of the docs, since it's a pretty basic
rule. I've attached a small patch. Tell me what you think.

Cheers!

-- 
www.mhelvens.net


ATOM RSS1 RSS2