LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Standard journal macros
From:
"John Palmer ([log in to unmask])" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Sep 1999 10:02:57 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
I wrote:
>  >  publishers will need to agree on a common DTD;

On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> Docbook and TEI not good enough?

I'm pretty new to publishing; but the two publishers I've worked for each
have their own peculiar DTD for journal articles.  Where's the
standardisation?

John Palmer
69 St Cross Road, Winchester SO23 9RE, England
+44 1962 865261
[log in to unmask]
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2