LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
From: Chris Rowley <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 22:18:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (27 lines)

> What are the correct LaTeX commands? I think that these are exactly the
> commands which are correct from the TeX's point of view, aren't they?

They are as documented in the LaTeX manual plus documentation that
comes with the standard distribution.  The example that gave rise to
this is an example of how they are not "anything TeX likes".

It would be difficult for us to make them anything else.

> I think that those parsers, if they want to be correct, *should* parse
> according to the general TeX syntax (and semantics).

No, not if they are parsing LaTeX documents.

You see TeX can have any syntax (in some sense of any:-) so a parser
that could do that would be as difficult to produce as TeX.

> [ But there is really only one correct parser---TeX ;-) ]

For TeX, yes (thankfully:-); but not for LaTeX documents.