## LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

 Options: Use Classic View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

 Re: HyperLaTeX Sebastian Rahtz <[log in to unmask]> Fri, 12 Sep 1997 14:31:29 +0100 text/plain (26 lines) > With incompatible \specials, some expertise is needed to even be able to  > exchange TeX source. "some", yes, one cannot deny.  > This is exactly the kind of problem the latex project has solved for  > users of straight latex (without \specials). In the world of \specials,  > we have the same kind of anarchy that existed for latex 2.09 macro  > packages. i certainly do deny this. the LaTeX team have consistently and thoroughly promoted the use of packages which conceal \special s from view, in the area of color and graphics inclusion. I would argue that hyperrref follows the same lead. The typical user has a non-committal LaTeX file saying:  \usepackage{foo} and a global .cfg file saying that their preferred driver is XXX (or you can build a special format file which says this). then the LaTeX file can safely be shipped to me, who has driver YYY, and all is well. granted, this is far from ideal, but its not the \special anarchy which we had a few years ago. Sebastian