LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Y&Y Help Line <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Nov 1999 07:03:12 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
At 11:57 AM 11/19/1999 +0100, you wrote:

>I wrote:
> >   no, any TeX using mltex option is independent of encodings. You can
> >   use CM, EC, Times, ... what you want with any related encoding.
> >   It would be so easy if all formats around the world were done
> >   with the mltex option. It's free, standard (as an option can be) and
> >   without any danger. But life is different ;=)

>DR> I meant "the brand of TeX you are using is *usually* not
>DR> independent of the (font) encoding you use."
>
>it should. Only few TeX engines don't accept all font encodings,
>which ones?

Windows TeX implementations (other than Y&Y TeX) are limited
to permutations of Windows ANSI encoding for on screen and
non-PS printing.  Macintosh TeX implementations are limited
to permutations of Macintosh standard encoding for on screen and
non-PS printing.  (This is for text fonts, non-text fonts like CM have
their own hard-wired encoding and are not reencoded).



--
Berthold K.P. Horn    [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2