LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"William F. Hammond" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 1 Oct 2000 17:55:34 -0400
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Chris Rowley writes:

> What we have not done yet, due to `stafff shortages', is any detailed
> work on building the requirements of multi-use documents (via hyperef
> or any other pakage) into the new experimental work that I am sure you
> are all right now busily testing.

Is it correct to assume that "multi-use" in the context of LaTeX 3
documents refers only to (1) regular latex and (2) pdflatex?

If so, is it agreed that broader senses of "multi-use" would stretch
LaTeX, the language (as it will be in LaTeX 3), too far?

Thanks.

                                    -- Bill

ATOM RSS1 RSS2