LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:57:39 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Reinhard Kotucha <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (25 lines)
If you mention \includeonly, something different comes into my mind:

\includeonly expects a comma-seperated list like
\includeonly{file1,file2}.  This is quite intuitive but has a few
restrictions, especially with spaces in filenames.  (Though I think
spaces should be avoided, they definitely don't make life easier.)

The graphics package provides an other kind if list syntax:

In LaTeX3 it would be better to have only one type of list syntax, at
least at user level.


Reinhard Kotucha                                      Phone: +49-511-4592165
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover                              mailto:[log in to unmask]
Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO.