## LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

 Options: Use Classic View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

 Re: XML, UTF-8 and TeX engines William F Hammond <[log in to unmask]> Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:47:35 -0400 text/plain (34 lines) Barbara Beeton <[log in to unmask]> writes: > timothy murphy asked, > > > And isn't it quite sensible to distinguish between text and maths? > > and torsten bronger responded, > > XML doesn't do it and I find this very convenient. In (La)TeX, for This statement about XML is not helpful without reference to a particular document type. For example, gellmu article does provide elements called "math" and "displaymath", which when formatted to LaTeX switch on the corresponding math mode. As LaTeX is evolving it will be possible for gellmu's "alpha" (an empty element marked up in Gellmu source as \alpha) to be formatted in LaTeX as (math) \alpha when recursively inside a math element and not inside either of gellmu's "mbox" or "text", while outside of math "alpha" could easily be morphed to a suitable unicode point. And Timothy Murphy wrote: > Wouldn't "true unicode support" require fonts with 64000 glyphs? That's roughly the number of points in a single plane of unicode. The current design provides 16 planes, but I believe that less than half are defined. Not all of these points correspond to simple glyphs. For example, some points are combining characters.                                     -- Bill