LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phillip Helbig <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Oct 1997 12:45:18 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
> >%DO WE NEED MORE ARGUMENTS?
> >\date{received in original form}{received}{accepted}
> How do you accomodate for the following
> `Accepted by ...;

A name goes here?

> received ..... This paper has been with the authors ...
> months for ... revision(s).

Is this format really used anywhere?

   Accepted by Joe Smith; received 26
   June 1996.  This paper has been with the authors 7 months for
   3 revisions.


--
Phillip Helbig                          Email ... [log in to unmask]
Nuffield Radio Astronomy Laboratories   Tel. ..... +44 1477 571 321 (ext. 297)
Jodrell Bank                            Fax ................. +44 1477 571 618
Macclesfield                            Telex ................. 36149 JODREL G
UK-Cheshire SK11 9DL                    Web .... http://www.jb.man.ac.uk/~pjh/

My opinions are not necessarily those of NRAL or the University of Manchester.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2