LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Hans Aberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 2 Jul 1998 00:31:01 +0200
text/plain (28 lines)
Frank Mittelbach wrote:
> >   If "/" does not prove to be suitable, then it can easily be changed to
> > something else at some later point.
>with absolutely the same argument i vote for keeping it the way as it

  Why bother about voting if you are the man? :-)

>..the specification says \<module>_<funcname>:<argspec> and it is as
>trivial as changing / to something else to replace \\[a-zA-Z]+_ by
>\\[a-zA-Z]+/ and i'm happy to do this if there is a need for this,

  Clearly not as it excludes those who want to experiment with submodules...

> eg
>if you prove me wrong and your module/submodule mechanism can be made
>workable in practise or if after experiencing with the code i got
>enough people (that used it) saying that they feel \foo/bar:nn is
>better readable to them than \foo_bar:nn

...and then nobody will bother developing it. :-)

  Hans Aberg
                  * Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
                  * Home Page: <>
                  * AMS member listing: <>