Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:53:19 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 2015-09-20 at 22:24:33 -0400, Boris Veytsman wrote:
> RK> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 03:51:44 +0200
> RK> From: Reinhard Kotucha <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
> RK> The viewport is specified in terms of pixels. After downsampling the
> RK> photos I had to change the viewport arguments (divide them by the
> RK> downsampling factor). This had to be done manually and thus was quite
> RK> inconvenient.
>
> RK> It would be quite handy to have an option which behaves similar to
> RK> viewport but accepts arguments relative to the size of the original
> RK> graphic, for instance [0.15 0.2 0.87 0.98].
>
> I am sorry if this is an offtopic here, but the package rviewport in
> LaTeX2e (full disclosure: written by me and paid for by the Food and
> Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) does exactly this:
>
> \includegraphics[rviewport=0.15 0.2 0.87 0.98, clip]{image}
>
> is the syntax of the package.
>
> I have no objection, of course, if L3 uses this in the core graphics
> instead of a contributed code.
Thanks, Boris. This looks good. It's a pity that I wasn't aware of
it a few weeks ago.
However, I asked for the feature on this list because I hope that
LaTeX~3 will have more functionality in its core packages so that the
number of required packages can be reduced.
Regards,
Reinhard
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-3373112
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover mailto:[log in to unmask]
------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|