LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project

LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Hans Aberg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 19 Dec 1998 21:54:42 +0100
In-Reply-To:
Reply-To:
Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
At 15:38 +0000 1998/12/19, Robin Fairbairns wrote:
>it is of course absolutely nothing whatever to do with object
>orientation in tex or the lack of it.  it's to do with what bits of a
>paragraph tex makes available to the user after it's been split into
>lines (not, as it happens, a lot).  how those bits would be made
>accessible, if that was going to happen) is a matter that could differ
>according to whether the underlying engine was trying to exhibit
>object orientation or not, but waving a magic o-o wand over tex won't
>alter the way it works in the smallest particular.

Well, that's the OO of the output language; and in order to get that OO in
the output language, you will need an engine able to process OO.

  Hans Aberg
                  * Email: Hans Aberg <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
                  * Home Page: <http://www.matematik.su.se/~haberg/>
                  * AMS member listing: <http://www.ams.org/cml/>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2