LATEX-L Archives

Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project


Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: xparse
From: David Carlisle <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:56:53 +0100
In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]> (message from James Kilfiger on Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:41:34 +0100)
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments: text/plain (29 lines)
> How will all this fit into the
> programming environment of Latex3?  Will xparse and friends be rewritten
> with \type_name:args.  In fact what is the status of this aspect of
> Latex3?

Open question. We were not exactly swamped with responses to that
 \type_name:args code. We found it useful (most of the time:-) but
if it looking so strange is going to hurt acceptance of any new system
it may not be worth it, or it may (don't know:-).

On the other hand the template interface is also aimed making things
look different, but to a different target audience, someone who isn't a
tex programmer (necessarily) and they probably don't like the existing
interface, so in that case there are only advantages in having a `new

> One feature which I think would be nice is a \newargumenttype macro,
> analogous to \newcolumntype of the array package.

What new sorts of argument would you want. (this is a real question
so I understand the functionality you are asking for)

> I wait with anticipation the template packages &c.

soon, although I have to write a talk on MathML before the UKTEX meeting
on Sunday/Monday:-)